<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Asset Allocations for the Typical Investor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedividendguyblog.com/asset-allocations-for-the-typical-investor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedividendguyblog.com/asset-allocations-for-the-typical-investor/</link>
	<description>One Guy's Journey to Passive Income Through Dividend Investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:31:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRIPs Are a Means to An End, Not A Reason to Buy a Stock &#124; The Dividend Guy Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.thedividendguyblog.com/asset-allocations-for-the-typical-investor/comment-page-1/#comment-55019</link>
		<dc:creator>DRIPs Are a Means to An End, Not A Reason to Buy a Stock &#124; The Dividend Guy Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedividendguyblog.com/?p=1485#comment-55019</guid>
		<description>[...] were in the DRIPs, but because they had a poorly planned portfolio that was not built around sound asset allocation principles and therefore not at all diversified. They were so focused on building up a portfolio of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were in the DRIPs, but because they had a poorly planned portfolio that was not built around sound asset allocation principles and therefore not at all diversified. They were so focused on building up a portfolio of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CanadianInvestor</title>
		<link>http://www.thedividendguyblog.com/asset-allocations-for-the-typical-investor/comment-page-1/#comment-54227</link>
		<dc:creator>CanadianInvestor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedividendguyblog.com/?p=1485#comment-54227</guid>
		<description>Consider a retired teacher with a 70% of final salary DB pension that more than covers all spending needs in retirement. Why would that person need any fixed income in a portfolio? Their pension is already fixed income and inflation-indexed to boot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider a retired teacher with a 70% of final salary DB pension that more than covers all spending needs in retirement. Why would that person need any fixed income in a portfolio? Their pension is already fixed income and inflation-indexed to boot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This and That: Canadian common sense edition</title>
		<link>http://www.thedividendguyblog.com/asset-allocations-for-the-typical-investor/comment-page-1/#comment-54224</link>
		<dc:creator>This and That: Canadian common sense edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedividendguyblog.com/?p=1485#comment-54224</guid>
		<description>[...] Much of the angst about portfolio returns (or the lack of it) can be traced to improper asset allocation. The Dividend Guy posted on some thumb rules for asset allocation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Much of the angst about portfolio returns (or the lack of it) can be traced to improper asset allocation. The Dividend Guy posted on some thumb rules for asset allocation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.thedividendguyblog.com/asset-allocations-for-the-typical-investor/comment-page-1/#comment-54169</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedividendguyblog.com/?p=1485#comment-54169</guid>
		<description>In the Intelligent Asset Allocator, I read that you get the most benifit from diversification when you diversify with &quot;non-correlating&quot; asset classes. Interestingly enough the addition of 10% bond allocation (90% stock) actually increases the potential return, while reducing risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Intelligent Asset Allocator, I read that you get the most benifit from diversification when you diversify with &#8220;non-correlating&#8221; asset classes. Interestingly enough the addition of 10% bond allocation (90% stock) actually increases the potential return, while reducing risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manshu</title>
		<link>http://www.thedividendguyblog.com/asset-allocations-for-the-typical-investor/comment-page-1/#comment-54165</link>
		<dc:creator>Manshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedividendguyblog.com/?p=1485#comment-54165</guid>
		<description>Asset allocation has something to do with relative asset prices also. There was a time when I had all my savings in stocks. And then there was a time when I had 50% in cashj and 50% in stocks. Relative price levels need to be considered while allocating assets as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asset allocation has something to do with relative asset prices also. There was a time when I had all my savings in stocks. And then there was a time when I had 50% in cashj and 50% in stocks. Relative price levels need to be considered while allocating assets as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
