International Investing – Investing for Diversification
- 6 Comment
From a purely academic perspective, I like the way that 1mill_by_35 has explained it. It comes down to the correlation coefficient:
Because of the imperfect correlation (for you stat people, the correlation coefficient for the sample period between the SPDRs and EEM was 0.68 and between SPDRs and EFA was 0.76), one ETF may be down but another may be up. By adding uncorrelated assets, risk factors can be reduced. It’s too much to go into here, but that is the accepted theory. The moral of the story is you get a better risk-reward trade-off by adding relatively uncorrelated asset classes to your portfolio.
In other words, international markets may not move up when the U.S. or Canada does, and visa versa. Having other countries represented in your portfolio may help balance out the drastic ups and downs you may have if you are just in one or two markets.
I have foreign investments in my portfolio – foreign for me means both the U.S. as well as more globally. For example, I hold about 26% of my portfolio in U.S. based investments. I also hold another 19% in other international investments – 45% of my portfolio is outside of Canada. I would like to see this number go up a bit more in the future.
6 Comments on this post
Trackbacks
-
empty spaces said:
check out everbank.com
they have an icelandic bond that pays 8% and a 3 month CD that invests in CDN, AUS and NZ dollar and offers 4.x%.
of course, if you’re money is already in CDN, you might want to look at something else!
March 20th, 2006 at 1:35 am -
Investing Intelligently said:
How about this argument:
“…we buy equity to earn the best possible ‘real return’ above the rate of Canadian inflation – and domestic equities are the likeliest asset type to do that consistently – hence their representation in a typical Canadian’s mix of assets.”
That comes from my advisor. Of course it’s only one of his reasons. Diversification and other things come into play. It makes more sense to me compared to fuzzy arguments like, as you say, “they have their home their (sic), their primary form of income comes from your home country, and even the government pension plan is funded by the country you live in”.
March 20th, 2006 at 4:53 pm -
The Dividend Guy said:
Hi Investing Intelligently,
I am not sure what you mean – do you agree that a person should be internationally diversified or should they not be?
March 20th, 2006 at 8:11 pm -
Investing Intelligently said:
They should definitely be diversified internationally. It would be a huge mistake to be 100% invested in any one country. But there are other factors tugging in the other direction, towards having a higher domestic concentration in one’s portfolio, such as the one mentioned by my advisor.
March 21st, 2006 at 3:18 am -
empty spaces said:
i totally agree. and now i think we’re going to see significant devaluation in the dollar.
I’ve invested in AUD, japanese reits, argentinian reits, oil and gas, canadian trusts, chinese companies and coins!November 3rd, 2006 at 4:14 am -
EAFE Pro said:
Now is the PERFECT time to invest in EAFE (Europe, Australasia, Far East) investments. Not only individual stocks, but Closed-end funds (CEFs), Exchange traded funds (ETFs) and mutual funds. Lots of gains to be had and http://eafepro.com describes them and helps you find the right investments.
January 2nd, 2010 at 10:45 pm
