Mutual Fund Returns Versus Individual Investor Returns
- 11 Comment
 |
(This article originally appeared on The DIV-Net) While listening to the podcast over at SoundInvesting.com, I was referred to an article by famed investment columnist Jason Zweig. In this article he spoke about the difference between what the mutual funds present as their investment returns in market materials and what individual investors actually made. To get to the point, here is the crux of the argument: The returns earned by mutual fund investors is much lower than that of the posted total returns.
Before I begin, I want to ensure you that this is not yet another bash the mutual fund post. I have enough of those over at The Dividend Guy. To prove this, have a look at this image from one of Zweig’s articles that talks about this difference in market returns versus individual investor returns. The difference is stunning!
With respect to mutual funds, the difference in individual investor returns is also much different than the returns touted as total returns.
Stunningly, while the average fund generated a 5.7% annualized total return over the four years, the average fund investor earned just 1%. In every category except two (equity income and utilities), investors earned less than their funds did.
The main question from this research is why is there such a huge discrepancy between what mutual funds earn and what their investors actually achieve while invested in those funds. In my mind, the answer is very simple.
It has everything to do with individual investor behaviour and trying to chase those hot mutual funds. You know how it works – you go over to Monrningstar or MSN Money and do some extensive searches for mutual funds that have been kicking butt over the past 3, 5, or even 10 years. You arrive at a list of the best performing stocks and you invest in them, thinking that your returns are now going to match the returns of that fund. Guess what – on average your returns differ from those total returns posted by the fund by about 4.7%. Over a number of years that can translate into differences of thousands of dollars.
As investors, we need to change our behaviour and stop chasing the hottest mutual funds or the hottest dividend stocks. We also need to ensure that we do not get suckered into a fools game of trying to match those marketed returns of the mutual funds. We will not match those returns, no matter how hard you try or how lucky you get.
My suggestion is to avoid mutual funds altogether. The fees charged by these funds make it even harder (impossible) for you to earn the same posted returns they advertise. Instead, focus on building a core portfolio of internationally diversified index funds and if you want add some dividend growth companies, but only if you have the time and inclination to track those stocks. And most importantly do not get discouraged if your returns don’t match the returns of what seems like everyone else’s portfolio. Over the long term your returns will begin to match that of the market. The key is consistency and a long term focus.
You are interested in dividend investing? Check out my Free Dividend Investing eBook and don't forget to sign-up to my RSS Feeds!
Similar posts:
11 Comments on this post
Trackbacks
-
Matt Good said:
Perhaps even more important that building a diversified portfolio is understanding your risk tolerance and building a portfolio to fit. These people are losing money not because their fund choices are poor (well, perhaps that too…), but because they haven’t mastered their own behavior. The folks that sold after loosing money paid a big price to understand the real limits of their risk tolerance…
August 21st, 2008 at 8:06 am -
thankfulforfools said:
Isn’t the simple answer to mutual funds vs. anything whether or not you have a decent startup capital? I mean, if you’re dealing with chump change mutual funds are generally easier due to the lack of trade commissions. It’s only in small amounts that the ETF can actually be less than the trade commissions.
Am I wrong?
August 21st, 2008 at 2:10 pm -
ETF Guy said:
I still don’t get why company retirement plans are still most mutual funds and not ETFs.Well, I guess I do get it — they make more money for the plan providers.
August 23rd, 2008 at 7:01 pm -
Lisa Adam said:
Dividend growth funds have 10-year CAGRs in the top ten precent of all equity funds. I’m happy being in the top 10 precent and see no point in taking more risk in an attempt to get to the top 5 percent.
————
Too bad the GOP has such bad advisors. If McCain had been allowed to be himself, and if Ms Palin was rejected, the election results would have been very different.
Palin cost us the election; the GOP needs to stop pandering to the far right.
November 21st, 2008 at 11:57 pm -
Daddy Paul said:
I think the number one reason investors do so poorly is fear. They sell at the bottom. I recall a guy buying internet funds in early 2000.
January 1st, 2010 at 2:29 pm
[...] Original post by The Dividend Guy [...]
buy a foreclosed house…
Ok, well since the sky is falling, many people are looking for sources of private money loans. Here are a few:…
[...] 2.Mutual Fund Returns Versus Individual Investor Returns [...]
hailey idaho real estate…
0775- Aggrandize Ciarán in reference to Disert- Kieran dies. Irish Jerome and music critic 1161- Chief Qinzong in relation to Tiling dies(b. 1100). 1381- Shahzada Richard II relating to England meets the leaders pertaining to Peasants Riot. 1381- Simo…
first time investors…
system- built homes, (modular homes) provide a sizable portion of Modular Homes Are utilized, and bracing and your home builders discussed the consumer, pay less on top of January 2008. Although a new 2,000 square and coastal environments. System- buil…
[...] It doesn’t get much simpler than that…right? So how do you explain this? [...]