Dec 18 2007

Women Investors Kick Guy’s Butts


Women Investors Kick Guy’s Butts

I think the male readers of this blog can learn a few things from the ladies out there when it comes to investing. According to an article in The Star, a 15 year study was conducted that compared the investment results of men and women. The research showed that women’s portfolios gained 1.4% more than the guys portfolios did. In another research study, results showed that all-women investment clubs out gained all-male clubs by 4.6%. These results are from a study conducted on behavioral finance by two professors at the University of California at Davis named Terry Odean and Brad M. Barber. What were some of the factors that lead to better performance? What should those of us who are male learn about these results? Here are some of the things that the researches highlighted:

Women are less risk tolerant

We talk a lot about risk on this site. When comparing women investors to men, women avoid more risk than men do. One thing I think that investors (and perhaps guys more than gals) get confused about it the risk reward balance. Just because you take on more risk, does not mean you will get more reward. You should expect more reward for more risk, but that does not always happen. This study highlighted the fact that showing some prudence and taking less risk has meant more reward.

Men tend to be over-confident and women want more information

According to the researchers, overconfidence is usually a result of a mistaken belief among investors that they have sufficient knowledge on which to base decisions. In other words, you don’t know what you don’t know but women realize this better than men do and it helps their investing. As men we need to realize that we don’t know everything and that it is alright to ask questions and look for more information until we have enough answers to base a decision off of.

Men need to think longer term

One thing the study highlighted was the fact that the average turnover of shares for men is nearly 1.5 times that for women, which obviously impacted their performance. I suspect the impact of fees and commissions played a big part in this as more frequent trading has high friction costs. Thinking about myself, I tend to get bored really easy and like to jump from one thing to the next. With investing, I have had to consciously focus on not doing this and sticking to the stocks I buy. The fact that the dividends keep growing helps, but at first it was tough.

So there you have it guys, some things that we can all learn from the women investors out there. Put the ego to the side, realize that you can always do some more research, and think long term and your investing performance can improve. And for you ladies, good job – just one more thing we guys can learn from you.


TAGS:

15 Comments on this post

Trackbacks

  1. This and That wrote:

    [...] Dividend Guy finds out why women kick butt when it comes to [...]

    December 21st, 2007 at 7:44 am
  2. Money, Finance and Fancy: The Carnival of Personal Finance #132, Whimsical Christmas Edition wrote:

    [...] Women Investors Kick Guys’ Butts @ The Dividend Guy Blog: Some interesting studies have shown that women’s portfolios gained 1.4% more than their male counterparts. Other research has shown that all-women investment clubs out gained all-male clubs by 4.6%. Hmmm…. [...]

    December 24th, 2007 at 9:51 am
  3. Carnival of Personal Finance » Carnival of Personal Finance #132 wrote:

    [...] Women Investors Kick Guys’ Butts [...]

    December 24th, 2007 at 10:53 am
  4. The Honest Dollar | Carnival of Personal Finance #132 at The Digerati Life wrote:

    [...] “Women Investors Kick Guy’s Butts” from The Dividend Guy Blog.  Apparently female investors outperformed male investors slightly according to a UC Davis study.  My boyfriend and I certainly fit the molds that the study set forth: I put a lot more thought and study into my investment decisions than he does, and I also hold my investments longer. [...]

    December 24th, 2007 at 1:29 pm
  1. Jake said:

    Great article to kick off the day. I generally agree with all the points made. It would also seem that women would be more prone to adopt dividend strategies since they are lower risk and long-term investments.

    December 18th, 2007 at 9:31 am
  2. telly said:

    Unfortunately, I probably tend to think more like a guy. I think I need to find one of those all-women investment clubs…or maybe start my own. :)

    Great insightful post.

    P.S. Chick’s Rule! :)

    December 18th, 2007 at 11:17 am
  3. Sami said:

    Who would thunk that women who are described, rightly or not, as emotional would be better investors.

    I think that seeking information and patience is the difference. So from now on I will have any buy or sell to be approved first by my wife.

    December 18th, 2007 at 12:45 pm
  4. Matt said:

    I’ve heard this before as well with the added point that women don’t care to pay attention to business news and what the stock market is doing day to day. It helps them to stick with their portfolio longer because they are oblivious to the daily ramblings of CNBC and the like.

    This also seems to contradict the point about men not wanting more information. Some times you need to know when the information becomes too much.

    December 18th, 2007 at 2:24 pm
  5. finance girl said:

    My anecdotal takeaways: Women are very intimidated by investing (if I am discussing $ with a woman, she tends to focus on the budget and cost cutting stuff, and I lose her re: investing).

    Men are way overconfident with investing (they don’t like funds, they want to do individual stocks,and they are positive they know what they are doing; and in general not so good savers).

    December 18th, 2007 at 3:15 pm
  6. Dividends4Life said:

    The analysis is spot on. I seem to remember a similar study in the Harvard Business Review seveal years ago with the same conclusion. My wife thinks that anything that “can” go down is too risky. :)

    Best Wishes,
    D4L

    December 18th, 2007 at 5:12 pm
  7. Leading Edge Boomer said:

    I also remember similar studies on new small business startups. According to those studies, women tend to take less risk and stick to try and true models. Men are more likely to try something really new, and riskier They have higher failure rates in these businesses as a result. However, they are also more likely to introduce something really new into the business world. Innovation is always a risky venture.

    December 18th, 2007 at 10:11 pm
  8. Blue said:

    Fair enough LEBD, but if you had to have your money managed by someone who was using a ‘tried and true’ model or was trying something really new and riskier, which would you go with?

    December 19th, 2007 at 7:42 am
  9. Leading Edge Boomer said:

    At my point in life , Blue December, I go with the lower risk investment. I was never an early adopter at any time of my life anyway. I was never a big risk taker either. However, all the studies seem to indicate that men in general take greater risks with their money than women. Sometimes taking said risk leads to disaster, and other times leads to innovation and progress.

    December 19th, 2007 at 10:15 am
  10. Ryan S. said:

    Hm. That’s interesting. I definitely believe women tend to be more risk averse than men, the question I am less sure about is whether or not men blow it by being too confident. I realize confidence plays a large part in investing psychology, but I’m not sure how the gender difference would be…
    -
    Ryan
    http://uncommon-cents.net/

    December 19th, 2007 at 11:22 am
  11. Katie said:

    Go girls – we are the superior investor

    I am so much better with money than my husband, brothers and father (and most other males)

    Girls have a look at this website – its a video to make money – it goes for 27 mins which is longer than a male can concentrate for

    http://www.investmentintelligence.com.au/cmd.php?Clk=2208474

    Go girls
    Katie

    January 8th, 2008 at 6:36 am

LEAVE A COMMENT

Subscribe Form

Subscribe to Blog

Recommended Book

Read Rob Carrick's 's Book - an author that has mentionned this blog in the past

My Broker

Questrade
Democratic Pricing - 1 cent per share, $4.95 min / $9.95 max

Keep Up-to-Date

twitter1gif
newspaper_feed_128x128

The Dividend Guy Sponsors

The Div-Net

Investment Links

Online Dividend Calendar

Friends of The Dividend Guy



Provident Loans

Invoice Discounting - Hitachi

credit cards

Need emergency cash and can't wait for your paycheck, get a payday loan and have the funds transferred overnight

Mortgage Brokers at Savills Private Finance

Debt Management

Personal Bad Credit Loans for every need and budget.

Get Out of Debt

Emergency Cash

Loan Insurance Claim from Keypoint

payday loans

Borrow payday loans UK online and receive up to £500 for your next payday loan

The Bettertrades stock reviews , online discussion forums and trading software can help trader earn rich dividends from stock market.

Bankruptcy is a serious measure - seek expert debt advice on various debt solutions available.

Networks

Seeking Alpha Certified


Money Hackers Network

Get Out of debt

If you're stuck in debt and trying to get caught up, don't resort to payday loans. They almost always have high interest rates, so if you don't pay them back immediately you will just end up in even more debt. In these tough times, it's better just to learn how to be more frugal with your money.

Twitter Posts

Powered by Twitter Tools

Disclaimer

Any information shared on The Dividend Guy does not constitute financial advice. The Dividend Guy is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and does not purport to tell or suggest which securities readers or customers should buy or sell for themselves. The Website is intended to provide general information only and does not attempt to give you advice that relates to your specific circumstances. You are advised to discuss your specific requirements with an independent financial adviser. For more information, click here. All posts are © 2005-2009, The Dividend Guy.