Funny enough, I’m not the best guy around to update you on my own portfolio. I really like blogging about dividend investing, but I don’t talk too much about my own stuff. Once in awhile, I think it makes sense to share my portfolio with you (my portfolio page is currently up-to-date, yeah!).
Instead of simply telling you how much I received in dividends, I’ll do a complete portfolio review with you.
An investment strategy is only good for a person if it meets its investment goal and respects the risk tolerance (both at the same time!). This is what is so marvelous about investing; you and I may disagree on an investment strategy and yet we can be both right! Starting from this premise, I have to tell you a little bit more about how I see things.
First, I’m young (34 now) and have a defined benefit pension plan at work. This means that if I work until the age of 65, I will then receive 70% of the average of my 5 best years ever at work. In other words; I really don’t need to worry about my financial future once retired. This is why my portfolio is 100% invested in equities (62% in US stocks and 38% in Canadian stocks at the moment). This is also why my portfolio is fairly small (currently valued at $65,000). I value life and living experiences more than saving plus a good part of my income already goes into my pension plan which is managed by my employer. My pension plan alone is worth around 90-100K but I have no control over it whatsoever.
Second, I’m Canadian. This explains that all my returns and holdings are translated into Canadian dollars. I made a good move back in 2012 to start buying US stocks. It helped me diversify my portfolio and the currency exchange rate was near even back then.
Third, I started to seriously build a dividend growth portfolio back in 2012. During this year, I had “leftovers” from aggressive trading that didn’t go well. For the record, I lost a few thousand in a trade on BlackBerry (BBRY) previously known as Research in Motion (RIM). This trade alone killed my investment return back in 2012. Since then, things have gone a lot better!
Fourth, my investing goal is to make money with my investments (duh). I choose dividend growth investing as my strategy because I believe it is one of the most effective investment methods that will help me achieve my goal (making money investing). Past research has proven dividend growth investing works and this is why I decided to make the switch. However, I haven’t been blinded by my dividend yield or how much I receive in dividend payments each year. I don’t expect to use this money in a near future and I would rather see it grow globally with both strong capital appreciation and strong dividend growth. This is why you will not find high yielding companies (KMI’s of this world don’t interest me at all) in my portfolio. In fact, you will probably find that I don’t generate much yield for a dividend investor even though every company in my portfolio pays dividends.
Let’s start by the entire holding in my portfolio:
|Canadian National Railway||CNR.TO||Industrial|
|Walt Disney||DIS||Consumer, cyclical|
|Gluskin & Sheff||GS.TO||Financial|
|Helmerich & Payne||HP||Energy|
|Johnson & Johnson||JNJ||Healthcare|
The dividend yield mentioned here is the current dividend yield. The yield based on cost of purchase is about 4.20%. Not bad for someone who started to built his dividend growth portfolio about 4 years ago!
With no surprise, my four best performing stocks are all US (AAPL, DIS, LMT, KO). Note that besides KO, they are not the most conservative dividend stocks ;-). This is because I didn’t build my portfolio like many other dividend investors that start by looking at the yield. I preferred building a set of 7 investing rules that use dividend growth as the first stepping stone of my portfolio. If you look at the dividend growth metric for these four companies, you will notice that the “worst” (this is a big word) performer is Coca-Cola with 3 year and 5 year dividend growth of 7%. Lockheed Martin shows 12% and 14% while Disney is a champion at 41% and 36%. Apple stands alone at 66% for the past 3 years, but it’s obvious it won’t keep up such an increase rate.
Source: author’s chart
Even though I have a relatively small portfolio, it is important for me to maintain a good balance. My portfolio shows 13 companies split among 9 different sectors with 7 of them showing between 9% and 21% of my total portfolio. You will notice that highly volatile sectors such as basic materials and energy are the other 2 small sectors closing the list with 2% and 3%. I don’t need to take speculative risk with my portfolio as I have my two feet well established on solid ground. This makes a great difference when picking my next purchase!
Now that the theory has been shared, it’s time to show if this has been a successful strategy, right? Here are my past 4 year’s results as at March 25th:
Source: author’s chart (Total returns for my portfolio and VIG and XDV)
As previously mentioned, 2012 isn’t really representative of my dividend growth strategy, but still, it is part of my investment return. Overall, I’m quite proud of my results. If I had invested $100 in 2012 in my portfolio, it would worth $158.31 today. If I had invested in the VIG, I would have $159.90 and if I had invested in the XDV, the result would have been $124.21. Therefore, I’m doing better than my benchmark indexes. Or, if you prefer, I should continue spending time to do my own research instead of index investing ;-).
I’ve applied the same rule I use for my portfolio to manage our 12 DSR portfolios. Our results since October 2013 are even better. You can check them out here.
As you already know, I’m not a big fan of tracking my dividend income. However, what really interests me is my dividend income growth rate. It is important not just looking at the dividend income, but to look at how much you increased the capital at the same time. For example, if your dividend payment went from $1,000/year to $2,000/year within a period of 5 years this looks very good. However, if you had $30,000 invested on year one (generating a 3.33% dividend yield) and you keep saving money and add another $30,000 of savings over the next 5 years, you still generate the same dividend yield. Therefore; you are not doing very good at dividend growth investing. You are just doing great at saving money (but really, any type of investment would do since your strength is in saving money, not investing it).
Here’s how both my dividend income and savings grew over the past 4 years:
|Dividend Growth Rate||N/A||28.48%||28.35%||15.32%|
|Capital Growth Rate||N/A||17.81%||12.51%||1.90%|
Source: author’s chart
As you can see, I was able to save more money in 2013 and 2014. This helped boost my dividend growth rate by nearly 30%. But the dividend growth rate of 2015 is most interesting in my opinion since it has been generated almost exclusively by my current holdings and not by additional contributions to my investment account. This is where I see the “true” power of dividend growth investing; the dividend income grew by itself!
Thoughts on my portfolio?
At the moment, I’m fairly happy with my portfolio and the past years’ results. The only bad thing about investing is that your investment strategy takes years to be proven. Having success over the past 4 years is not enough to claim that my system is flawless. It is just enough to claim that it works… at the moment 😉
I’d like to read what you think of my portfolio or investing style? Do we share similar holdings?
Special Deal For The Dividend Guy Blog’s Readers
Since I really like the newsletter, I decided to subscribe myself and ask for a rebate for you, Anyone who wants to subscribe to this newsletter will have to pay $139 and I got it for $40!
Click here to sign-up this offer is only good for 30 days!
For only $40, your subscription includes The Successful Investor newsletter delivered each month (12 x a year), this is $3.33 per newsletter. It also includes their weekly email Hotline Service (value $75.00, free with your subscription) and a monthly portfolio supplement. Subscribers will also receive access to the complete library of back issues and previous hotlines.
CLICK HERE To SAVE $99 ON YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
PSST! If you are a DSR members, send me your confirmation and I’ll send you another rebate by check!
Disclaimer: long for all of the above.
Thanks for sharing the portfolio Mike. I think it looks pretty good, and makes a lot of sense considering the social safety nets and pension you have in Canada. The state pensions in my part of the US have been raided by the politicians and benefits have been reduced as a result. I hope your politicians show more fiscal responsibility.
Good diversification, and I hope you have a great week buddy
In Canada, they decided to change the pension page at 67 instead of 65 and then, the new Gov’t changed it back to 65. I think it wasn’t responsible as we live longer, it’s only normal to retire at older age (for those who are not looking to reach FI anyway!).
Thx for the details on your life and goals. It helps to understand the goals and actions.
Do I get it right: You plan to work till age 67?
Also, The value of your employer pension fund, it is actually irrelevant as you have a defined benefit. What happens when you retire early.
(A lot of questions, I just try to understand)
I like the metric you have: dividend growth vs capital growth
Thx for stopping by!
I don’t plan to work until the age of 67 (employer wants that, not me! hahaha!). I get the full pension if I retire at that age. This is my Plan C for retirement.
My plan A is to quit this year, go on my road trip across North America and Central America and work on y websites. I hope to live from my sites by the time I return in mid 2017.
If I quit, my pension plan gives me 2 options: I have a reduced annuity at the time of retirement or I get the pension plan value in cash (restricted account) and I manage it until I retire. I would go for option #2 ;-).
Sounds like a good plan!
Hi Mike, thanks for sharing your portfolio and thoughts with us.
I love reading the perspective of Canadian investors because it’s probably the most similar environment to Australia. Plus it’s fun seeing other portfolios from non-US investors point of view.
I like how diverse your portfolio is and there are lots of companies in there that should do great with time. Don’t feel too bad about Blackberry, it made sense at the time (like investing in Apple would do now) and you were being patriotic.
Dividend growth is more important that dividend total, which is what you’re aiming at 🙂
I’d love to see how the Australian market goes. It’s funny how Canada and Australia are so far away, but yet so similar!
Hey Mike, thanks for sharing.
This is my dividend growth rate
2011 – 26.90%
2012 – 21.66%
2013 – 9.01%
2014 – 30.37%
2015 – 28.54%
2016 – 12.48% (so far)
I have earned just over $39K in dividends since I started and moved away from mutual funds. That money is all back at work growing my nest egg.
This is quite impressive Eric, congrats!
Did you take out your capital growth? In both cases, this is amazing, congrats!
I like your work and your outlook on life. Just one question on Agrium. I really don’t like this stock, and I’m wondering why it is still a major part of your overall portfolio. Again, last week a guest pro. on BNN was advising the listeners to sell. I know why you bought it, but why do you keep it? Thanks.
In fact, Agrium represents only 2.3% of my portfolio. I’m aware it is a riskier stocks compare to others in my portfolio. However, I like the fact AGU gets a good part of its revenue from retail sales (crop nutriments and protections to farmers) protects it from potash price variation (as opposed to Potash). Farmers need to be more productive and AGU is selling products helping them being more productive. This is why I bought it.
I hope it makes more sense 🙂
I also own AGU and it will go through some up and downs. It’s one of the few stocks you can have in agriculture.
As for BNN, guests don’t always have an outlook on long term. They manage portfolios and use their approach to evaluate a stock. Go on StockChase.com and look at all the comments from many guests around a stock if you want to form a better opinion. With that said, often time there is timing involved for many of the guests. I have been watching them for 5 years now.
Sorry, meant to write @Michel